Regex-LE: Zero Hassle Regex Extraction & Validation
Find, test, and validate the regex patterns in the current file
Literal patterns, RegExp constructors, ReDoS screening
Useful? A star or rating is how other developers find it —
★ GitHub ·
★ Open VSX ·
★ Marketplace
What it does
Open any file and run one of three commands. Extract lists every regex pattern found in the document. Test (Ctrl+Alt+R / Cmd+Alt+R) runs a found — or manually entered — pattern against the file content and reports matches with real line/column positions and capture groups (named groups included). Validate checks every found pattern for syntax errors and screens it for ReDoS-prone shapes. Works in VS Code and VS Code–based editors like Cursor and VSCodium (installable from Open VSX).
Install
| Where |
What you get |
Install |
| VS Code |
The lint and the tester, in your editor |
Marketplace |
| Cursor, VSCodium, Windsurf |
The same extension |
Open VSX |
| A terminal or a CI step |
The same run over a whole tree, with exit codes |
cargo install regex-le · crates.io |
| Any MCP agent, via Node |
extract_patterns over stdio |
npx regex-le-mcp · npm |
| Zed |
The MCP server as a context server |
add it by hand (no listing yet) |
Use it from an AI agent
The same engine runs as an MCP server, so an agent can call it directly instead of you running a command.
| Editor |
How |
| VS Code 1.101+ |
Nothing to install — the extension registers extract_patterns with agent mode |
| Zed |
No listing yet — add the MCP server by hand |
| Claude Code |
claude mcp add regex-le -- npx -y regex-le-mcp |
| Cursor, Windsurf, anything else |
point it at npx regex-le-mcp |
extract_patterns(content, format?, filename?, maxResults?)
Returns every pattern with its flags, 1-based position and a ReDoS verdict, so "are any of the regexes in this file dangerous?" is one call rather than two.
The server takes content and returns data — it reads no files and makes no network requests of its own. Published as regex-le-mcp on npm and as io.github.nolindnaidoo/regex-le in the MCP registry.
Configuring it by hand — any host with an MCP config file
Most hosts read a JSON config. Add one entry:
{
"mcpServers": {
"regex-le": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "regex-le-mcp"]
}
}
}
-y skips the install prompt on first run. Pin a version if you would rather not track releases — regex-le-mcp@2.3.0.
Prefer not to go through npx on every launch? Install it once and point at the binary instead:
npm install -g regex-le-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"regex-le": { "command": "regex-le-mcp" }
}
}
It speaks MCP over stdio and needs no environment variables, no API key and no configuration of its own. To check it before wiring it into anything:
echo '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"tools/list"}' | npx -y regex-le-mcp
That prints the tool list and exits — if you see extract_patterns, the server works.
Extraction scans the whole document, so constructors split across lines are found too. The document's language chooses which spellings to look for:
| Language |
Form |
Example |
| JavaScript, TypeScript, Ruby |
Literal |
/[a-z]+/gi |
| JavaScript, TypeScript |
Constructor |
new RegExp('\\d{4}-\\d{2}', 'g') — including multiline |
| JavaScript, TypeScript |
Bare constructor call |
RegExp("x\|y", "i") |
| Python |
re.compile and friends |
re.compile(r'(a+)+') |
| Rust |
Regex::new, RegexBuilder::new |
Regex::new(r"(a+)+") |
| Go |
regexp.MustCompile, regexp.Compile |
regexp.MustCompile(`(a+)+`) |
| Java |
Pattern.compile, Pattern.matches |
Pattern.compile("(a+)+") |
| Ruby |
Regexp.new |
Regexp.new('(a+)+') |
| PHP |
preg_match and friends |
preg_match('/(a+)+/i', $s) |
| C# |
new Regex(…), Regex.IsMatch and friends |
new Regex(@"(a+)+") |
A language nothing recognises is not a refusal — every spelling above is looked for. Naming it buys precision: a Python file is not scanned for bare /…/, so #!/usr/bin/env python stops reading as a pattern.
What is deliberately not extracted:
- Division, dates, and filesystem paths (
a / b, 10/29/2025, /usr/local/bin): a / preceded by an identifier, number, ), ], ., or another / is not treated as a regex — after keywords like return, it is. That question is only asked where a bare /…/ is legal.
- Candidates that are not a well-formed regular expression in any of these languages, or with invalid/duplicate flags. Another language's spelling is not a syntax error:
re.compile(r'(?P<word>\w+)+@') is reported as written, and still flagged.
- Constructor calls whose pattern argument is a variable or template literal (only literal string arguments are visible to a text scanner).
- Flags, on anything but a JavaScript literal or constructor: every other language sets them with constants, builder methods or an inline
(?i) rather than a string argument.
Duplicate pattern+flags pairs are listed once. This is lexing by heuristic, not a parser for nine languages: a slash inside a string or comment can still be picked up when its context looks expression-like.
ReDoS screening
Validate (and Test, before running a risky pattern) screens for the common catastrophic-backtracking shapes:
- High severity — nested unbounded quantifiers:
(a+)+, ([a-z]+)*
- Medium severity — quantified alternation with overlapping branches:
(a|ab)+
This is a structural scanner, not an automaton analysis: it cannot prove a pattern safe, only flag the dangerous shapes it recognizes. The reports also include a rough performance score based on execution time relative to input size — treat it as a hint, not a benchmark (memory is not measured).
The CLI
The same lint runs from a terminal or a shell pipeline: a Rust CLI in
crate/, sharing one corpus with the extension —
crate/fixtures/ — so the two can never read a
document differently.
regex-le . # every vulnerable pattern in the tree
regex-le --severity high src/ # only the exponential shapes
regex-le --all src/ # every pattern, vulnerable or not
regex-le mcp # the same lint over MCP on stdio
Exit codes: 0 nothing vulnerable, 1 at least one finding, 2 the
question was malformed — so regex-le . || exit 1 is a CI gate.
It ports the lint half, not the tester. Running a pattern against
your text with JavaScript semantics needs a JavaScript engine, and
getting it nearly right would mean the two frontends reporting different
matches for the same pattern. Testing is an editor activity; keep it
here. The lint needs no engine at all — the ReDoS verdict reads the
pattern text — which is what makes it a cheap deterministic CI step.
It flags shapes and cannot prove a pattern safe, exactly as the
screening in this extension cannot.
Commands
| Command |
Description |
Regex-LE: Test Regex (Ctrl+Alt+R / Cmd+Alt+R) |
Test a found or entered pattern against the file |
Regex-LE: Extract Patterns |
List every regex pattern found in the document |
Regex-LE: Validate Regex |
Syntax + ReDoS report for every found pattern |
Regex-LE: Open Settings |
Open Regex-LE settings |
Regex-LE: Help & Troubleshooting |
Built-in documentation |
Settings
| Setting |
Default |
Description |
regex-le.openResultsSideBySide |
true |
Open results beside the current editor |
regex-le.copyToClipboardEnabled |
false |
Also copy results to the clipboard |
regex-le.notificationsLevel |
silent |
all = every notification, important = warnings + errors, silent = errors only |
regex-le.safety.enabled |
true |
Guardrails for very large files and outputs |
regex-le.safety.fileSizeWarnBytes |
1000000 |
Refuse processing above this file size |
regex-le.safety.largeOutputLinesThreshold |
50000 |
Refuse result documents above this line count |
regex-le.statusBar.enabled |
true |
Show the status bar item |
regex-le.telemetryEnabled |
false |
Local-only event log (see Privacy) |
regex-le.regex.redosDetectionEnabled |
true |
ReDoS screening in Test/Validate |
regex-le.regex.maxMatchLimit |
1000 |
Cap on matches collected per test (10–10000) |
Languages
Twelve languages besides English:
German · Spanish · French · Indonesian · Italian · Japanese · Korean ·
Portuguese (Brazil) · Russian · Ukrainian · Vietnamese · Chinese (Simplified)
Both halves are covered — the manifest (command titles, setting names and
descriptions) and everything shown while the extension runs (notifications,
the status bar, quick-picks and prompts). The extension follows VS Code's
display language, so it matches whatever the editor is already set to; no
setting of its own.
Privacy & security
- No network access. The extension never sends data anywhere. The
telemetryEnabled setting only writes events to a local Output Channel you can inspect (Regex-LE Telemetry).
- Testing a pattern the ReDoS screen rates high-severity asks for confirmation first.
- The MCP server holds the same line. It takes content as an argument and returns data: no filesystem access, no network calls, no telemetry. Your agent already has file-read tools, so duplicating them inside the server would add a path-traversal surface for no capability.
check:mcp-bundle fails the build if the server ever imports something that could reach either.
- Error notifications redact home directories and credential-shaped fragments.
Documentation
| Input |
Size |
Found |
Time |
Rate |
Scan speed |
| JS with literals |
1.12 MB |
25,000 |
44.19 ms |
565,679/sec |
25.4 MB/s |
| JS with constructors |
1.27 MB |
25,000 |
41.86 ms |
597,268/sec |
30.3 MB/s |
| Source without regexes |
1.24 MB |
0 |
18.75 ms |
— |
66 MB/s |
Median of 7 runs after warmup, on Apple M5 Pro, 24 GB RAM, Node 24.3.0. Inputs are generated
by scripts/benchmark.ts rather than checked in, so the sizes above are
exactly what was measured. Reproduce with bun run benchmark.
These are machine-specific and are not asserted in CI — a benchmark that gates
a build only tells you how busy the runner was.
Testing
| Metric |
Coverage |
| Statements |
91.27% |
| Branches |
77.68% |
| Functions |
97.74% |
| Lines |
91.68% |
205 test cases across 15 files, plus an integration suite that runs
in a real VS Code extension host and an end-to-end test that installs the
built .vsix into a clean profile.
Generated from a real run — coverage/coverage-summary.json and
coverage/test-results.json — by scripts/coverage-readme.js; CI fails if
this section drifts. Reproduce with bun run test:coverage, and the case
count is the one vitest prints.
More from the LE family
Sixteen single-purpose tools for the work in front of every model. Each ships
a Rust CLI and an MCP server. One page: letools.dev
Get it out
- String-LE — Extract every string in a codebase, with its position, so a person can read them
- Numbers-LE — Extract every hardcoded number in a codebase, so a person can check them
- Units-LE — Extract every quantity with its unit, normalized, and refuse the ambiguous ones by name
- Dates-LE — Extract every date and timestamp, and the exact instant each one resolves to
- IDs-LE — Extract every UUID, ULID, NanoID, ObjectId and Snowflake, and decode the time inside
- IPs-LE — Extract every IP address, CIDR block and MAC, normalized and classified by scope
- URLs-LE — Extract every URL in a codebase, with its protocol and exact position
- Paths-LE — Extract every file path in a codebase, and say whether it still points at anything
- Colors-LE — Extract every color in a codebase, and say which ones are not in your palette
Check it
- Regex-LE — Find every regex in a codebase, and report which can be driven into catastrophic backtracking
- Versions-LE — Find where one dependency is constrained differently across a repository's manifests
- i18n-LE — Identify the i18n library a project uses, then audit its catalogs by that library's rules
- Scrape-LE — Check whether a page is scrapeable before the scraper is written, and say when it cannot tell
Guard it
- Secrets-LE — Find hardcoded credentials in a codebase, and never print one into the report
- EnvSync-LE — Compare the dotenv files in a tree, and say which keys are missing from which
- Unicode-LE — Find the Unicode that hides meaning — bidi controls, invisibles, homoglyphs, mixed scripts
Each stands on its own: no shared crate, no published core. Where two of them
agree, it is because the same answer was right twice.
Contact — nolindnaidoo.com · GitHub · LinkedIn
Also by nolindnaidoo
Rust — pixelcoords and pixelactions are one loop: pixelcoords answers
where, pixelactions acts there. Their own tools, their own voice — not
part of the LE family.
License
MIT © nolindnaidoo